Just curious out of boredom lads .
1. Do not post any personal information about yourself or anyone else.
2. Be mature and constructive in your posts here. Criticism is absolutely permitted but let's be nice.
3. Do not advertise vendor services without first asking the moderators.
4. We do not permit the discussion, or sale of fake passports.
5. Do not name specific venues or organisations in relation to using fake IDs.
6. We do not allow the sale of real ID's or documents.
7. Do not describe vendors stealth or how they concealed cards in packages.
8. Do not post order identifiers such as your order number, tracking number or tracking timestamps.
9. Potential vendors must not make posts about their work until confirmed with a moderator.
That pass holo looks so different wtf.Thowaway197 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 07, 2018 1:24 pmHere are photos of my V1, V1.1 and NoveltyUKID:
Used fake name for my g0ds so no need to worry about the details not fully covered
V1:
Front: https://i.imgur.com/BFrsgJ0.jpg
Back: https://i.imgur.com/D95nk2z.jpg
For their first attempt at the UK ID I actually think they did OK, however the problems are obvious with the really bold raised text and the smudged writing
V1.1:
Front: https://i.imgur.com/BYKEk3t.jpg
Back: https://i.imgur.com/GXzLsf6.jpg
Much better than the V1 with better raised text in print quality. Although the IDs were extremely glossy as seen and mine and a friends photo came out really dark and u couldn't really see details of my face. I once looked at it in the evening and u legit couldn't see my face in the picture lol
NoveltyUKID:
Front: https://i.imgur.com/EARwVwC.jpg
Side: https://i.imgur.com/6JXogoR.jpg
Back: https://i.imgur.com/acZecVJ.jpg
RIP Novelty. At the time their IDs were solid as fakes weren't common and obviously nobody knew what Citizencards were. Downsides were the cards themselves were low quality around the edges and the print quality wasn't great. And ordering was a massive pain because the queue would close for a month and reopen for about 30 minutes before it closed again.
Would be very interested to see photos of MyIDUK
I think there should be a thread made on ultimatefakes regarding laminate. There's a possibility he could try a non-bendy non-glossy card. As far as it goes with lenticular, I'm not crazily arsed. If a bouncer knows it shouldn't be flat there, they'll probably take your shit.Thowaway197 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 07, 2018 3:49 pmHave to agree that the V1 laminate was probably the best and isn't it basically the same as the laminate on the bendy V2s g0d made for a bit? Anyway yh they were good as the colour looked great and no shine. Downside is the raised text always looks worse and comes off way easier than the glossy laminate. I have no clue how lamination works but if g0d somehow used the V1 laminate with the original V2 raised text with a flat hologram that would be insane, + a new lent plswilk007 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 07, 2018 3:27 pm
V1s were the best laminate of them all lol, the only on with the lam that looked amazing. But that was literally the best thing about them lol. V1.1s started using the gloss but were much better IDs-- and they were provided for free to anyone who bought the V1 after V1 didn't live up to the hype.